Thursday, July 17, 2025
Get daily crypto news, blockchain alerts, and exclusive presale updates

Solana : Eclipse: The Layer 2 Bringing Solana’s Speed to Ethereum


Ethereum’s scalability challenges have spawned dozens of Layer 2 solutions, but most follow similar approaches using Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) compatibility. Eclipse breaks this mold by integrating Solana’s Virtual Machine (SVM) into an Ethereum Layer 2, creating a unique hybrid that promises the best of both worlds.

With $200 million in Total Value Locked (TVL), 1 million active wallets, and recent $ES token airdrop distribution, Eclipse is positioning itself as “Ethereum’s fastest L2.” But can this ambitious architectural experiment deliver on its promise of combining Ethereum’s security with Solana’s performance?

The Architecture: Four-Layer Innovation

Eclipse employs a modular approach that separates blockchain functions across specialized layers:

Settlement Layer: Ethereum

Eclipse uses Ethereum for transaction finality and security, posting state commitments to ensure censorship resistance. ETH serves as the primary gas token, leveraging Ethereum’s established security model.

Execution Layer: Solana Virtual Machine (SVM)

The breakthrough innovation—Eclipse runs Solana’s VM for transaction processing, enabling parallel execution and high throughput. This delivers nearly 9,000 peak TPS with transaction fees as low as $0.0002.

Data Availability: Celestia

Instead of storing data on expensive Ethereum blockspace, Eclipse uses Celestia’s dedicated data availability layer, significantly reducing costs while maintaining verification capabilities.

Proving Layer: RISC Zero

Zero-knowledge proofs from RISC Zero provide cryptographic verification of transaction validity, adding security without sacrificing efficiency.

Performance Metrics: The Numbers

Speed and Cost:

Peak TPS: ~9,000 transactions per second

Transaction fees: $0.0002 (compared to Ethereum’s $5-50)

Finality: Ethereum-level security with faster execution

Adoption Metrics:

TVL: Over $200 million

Active wallets: 1 million

Ranking: #60 by TVL on CoinGecko

These numbers suggest real usage beyond speculative interest, with Eclipse attracting developers and users seeking high-performance applications.

The $ES Token: Recent Airdrop and Future Utility

Token Basics:

Total supply: 1 billion $ES tokens

Distribution: Airdrop completed in early July 2025

Expected listing price: $0.50-$0.80 (speculation)

Current status: Not yet trading on major exchanges

Reported Allocations:

Community reports show varied airdrop amounts, with some users receiving 609 $ES tokens while others got smaller “peanut drops” of 85 $ES, creating mixed reactions about distribution fairness.

Future Utility:

Governance voting on protocol changes

Potential staking mechanisms

Ecosystem participation rewards

Additional Token: tETH

Eclipse also features tETH, described as the “first Unified Restaking Token,” allowing users to mint at teth.eclipse.xyz for diversified rewards exposure and unified liquidity.

Market Position and Ecosystem

Funding and Backing:

Total raised: $65 million

Series A: $50 million (March 2024)

Investors: Hack VC, Polychain Capital, Placeholder Ventures

Ecosystem Development:

Eclipse supports diverse applications including:

DeFi protocols leveraging high throughput

Gaming platforms like Turbo (2D game engine)

Consumer applications requiring fast, cheap transactions

Cross-chain bridges connecting Ethereum and Solana ecosystems

Integration Partnerships:

Eclipse connects to broader crypto infrastructure through partnerships with Hyperlane for interoperability and various DeFi protocols for liquidity.

Competitive Landscape

vs. Traditional L2s (Arbitrum, Optimism):

Advantage: Higher throughput through SVM vs. EVM limitations

Advantage: Lower costs via Celestia data availability

Risk: Less proven architecture and smaller ecosystem

vs. Solana Native:

Advantage: Ethereum’s security and established DeFi ecosystem

Advantage: Better decentralization than Solana’s validator set

Risk: Added complexity from multi-layer architecture

vs. Other Alt-VM L2s:

Eclipse isn’t alone in exploring non-EVM execution environments, but its specific combination of SVM + Celestia + RISC Zero creates a unique technical stack.

Challenges and Controversies

Token Distribution Concerns:

Recent social media discussions reveal community frustration with airdrop allocations, with some questioning the official status of distributions and others calling small allocations “peanut drops.”

Technical Complexity:

Eclipse’s four-layer architecture introduces multiple potential failure points:

Celestia data availability dependency

RISC Zero proving system reliability

Cross-layer security coordination

Potential censorship at any layer

Adoption Hurdles:

Developers must learn SVM instead of familiar EVM

Tooling and infrastructure still developing

Network effects favor established L2s

Investment Perspective

Bull Case:

Unique technical approach solving real scalability problems

Strong funding and experienced team

Growing ecosystem with substantial TVL

Potential for explosive growth if SVM adoption increases

Bear Case:

Unproven architecture with multiple dependencies

Strong competition from established L2s

Developer adoption challenges

Regulatory uncertainty around complex token structures

Key Metrics to Watch:

TVL growth and retention

Developer adoption and ecosystem expansion

$ES token price action when trading begins

Transaction volume and user retention

Future Outlook

Eclipse is developing the “Giga Scale Virtual Machine” (GSVM), a software-hardware co-designed blockchain indicating long-term ambitions beyond current L2 solutions. This suggests the team views their current architecture as a stepping stone to more ambitious infrastructure goals.

Potential Catalysts:

$ES token listing on major exchanges

Major DeFi protocol integrations

Gaming and consumer app adoption

Cross-chain bridge developments

Risk Factors:

Multi-layer architecture complexity

Dependency on external infrastructure (Celestia, RISC Zero)

Competitive pressure from established L2s

Regulatory scrutiny of complex token structures

Conclusion

Eclipse represents one of the most ambitious architectural experiments in Ethereum scaling, combining proven technologies from multiple blockchains into a novel hybrid solution. The early metrics—$200M TVL, 1M wallets, and strong developer interest—suggest the experiment is gaining traction.

However, success isn’t guaranteed. The complex four-layer architecture introduces multiple dependencies and potential failure points. The upcoming $ES token launch will provide crucial market validation of the project’s long-term viability.

For investors and developers, Eclipse offers exposure to a unique technical approach that could define next-generation blockchain infrastructure. Whether it succeeds depends on execution, adoption, and the broader market’s appetite for architectural innovation over incremental improvements.

The combination of Ethereum’s security with Solana’s performance is compelling in theory. Eclipse’s challenge is proving it works in practice while building the ecosystem and community needed for long-term success.

You can contact us for more informations or ads here [email protected]